Social/Society

Issue #597

27.01.12 - 02.02.12

Home

Home of Issue #597

About Us

Politics

Social/Society

Business

Culture

Top News

Conflict Update

People

Site Search

Archive

Electronic Version

How to subscribe

Contact Us

Top of Page

Newsletters

 
Webo.ge

2012 Georgian Wine Guide by Malkhaz Kharbedia

As a consumer guide the book is less useful than as a reference

Print version Print version

The fine wine of Georgia seems to merit barely a footnote, sadly, in the English language literature of wine. In his 2012 Pocket Wine Book the venerable British wine authority Hugh Johnson neglects to acknowledge the existence of Georgia, though Oz Clarke, in the 20th edition of his own pocket encyclopedia, does squeeze in some 100 words, suggesting that with “its diverse climates … and soils” Georgia might “produce every style imaginable,” and its “peppery, powerful red Saperavi could be a world-beater.”

Even voluminous wine encyclopedias seldom exceed an overview of winegrowing regions, grape varieties, and types of wine. Where there ought to have been something like a definitive work on Georgian wine in English there was a void, until now, with the recent publication of the 2012 Georgian Wine Guide by Malkhaz Kharbedia.

Like Johnson’s, Clarke’s, and other prototypes, the guide is pocketsize for handy reference, and pocketbook-friendly, about the price of a modest bottle of Saperavi. It is bilingual – Georgian on the top half of each page, grammatical English below – and its author is president of the Wine Club, which devotes itself to the appreciation, advancement, and traditions of Georgian wine.

In the guide are intriguing narratives of wine history(for which Georgia is believed to have written the world’s first chapter) and the nation’s love affair with distilled spirits: chacha, similar to Italian grappa and undeniably as bracing, and brandy that has given cognac a run for its money.

Also included are sections on grapes and where they are grown and vinified, the Georgian wine scene past and present, wine usage, tasting notes, and producers, organizations, festivals, etc. There are maps, quite small, not gatefolds, and much space is devoted to advertising, paid for predominantly by the makers of beverages.

Those using the guide as a Baedeker to previously unexplored territory may venture into Georgian wine country without putting a foot wrong. Kharbedia knows where, in Kakheti, to find the best micro-zones for Saperavi and Rkatsiteli. He has been to Satsivi, a “cold place” high in the Ateni Gorge in Kartli, where the “naturally low temperature” nurtures a “naturally sparkling wine.” And he has discovered the gorges in Lechkhumi in which to seek out Usakhelouri, “one of Georgia’s rarest wines.” Kharbedia convinces that he knows the terrain from east to west and top to bottom.

The tasting notes, though, even if taken as a complement to the elucidation of Georgian grape varieties, may leave some readers wondering just what to expect from a wine they contemplate purchasing. On occasion Kharbedia helpfully tracks the transit of a wine across the palate (“The first sip” of Badagoni’s 2008 Manavi “reveals very healthy aromas and notes of lemon, loquat and persimmon giving way to a mineral, slightly salty flavor”), but often heattends more to appearance and bouquet than he does to flavor, and there is a surfeit of the “distinctive aromas of ripe pear and thyme, and notes of sun-baked vegetation, nettles and coriander” sort of thing that has been driving bewildered readers to rating systems (points, stars, and the like) for years.

But Kharbedia rarely makes discriminating value judgments of any sort, quantitative or otherwise; he reviews over 100 wines, quite a lot considering that Georgia is a relatively small fine wine producing country, yet they all seem to bask, to one degree or another, in favorable light. Kharbedia is an enthusiast; and he has advertisers. As a consumer guide his book is less useful than as a reference.

To qvevri or not to qvevri? That is the question at the core of the book, and it crops up time and again. Vinify Georgian wine in clay vessels (known as “churi” in western Georgia) or oak barrels? “Traditional” or “European-style?” Kharbedia, it seems, would be a true believer in the qvevri if one of the “many people” who deem it “the ideal vessel in which to ferment Saperavi wine.”

He claims, “Thanks to the qvevri’s cone-like shape … the wine does not suffer from the presence of the grape pips, stems and marc … it actually benefits …” resulting in a wine “rich in tannins, with a high potential for aging…” But if tannins, as Kharbedia concedes, “are the most noticeable and unpleasant feature present in many red wines for most people,” then “traditional” Saperavi, in “stricter and more challenging markets,” may hit many a stone wall. Impatient consumers are likely to balk at astringent Saperavi that may or may not improve with cellaring, as well as at the startling tannin content of some “traditional” Rkatsiteli.

Meanwhile, a whopping 70% of exported Georgian wine is semi-sweet red, and presently neither the United States nor Great Britain (where the taste for red is decidedly dry) are major markets. Still, Kharbedia has high hopes pinned on Georgia’s “unique grape varieties,” the distinction of being “the homeland of wine,” and the attributes of the qvevri, all of which may pique the curiosity of the uninitiated, but none of which will win brand loyalty to disappointing, overpriced wines.

But where tradition may not be enough to make Georgian wine globally competitive, writing such as the best of Kharbedia’s may do more, captivating tasters and tourists alike, compelling them at the very most to make the pilgrimage to “the homeland of wine” and at the very least to seek out Georgian wines and give them a try.

By Robert Linkous

26.01.2012

Top | Go Back

Copyright ©2006, "Georgia Today"

Using materials of the site the reference on "Georgia Today" with the indication of the author is obligatory

Webmaster